Monday, January 11, 2010

Funk the War

From Students for a Democratic Society:

Fossil Hawks are the war-making corporate climate criminals and the politicians who serve them. They are the mining companies, energy companies, weapons manufacturers, military logistics companies, and mercenaries who profit from resource wars and lobby to sabotage US and UN environmental regulation. They are diversified corporations and lobbies invested in war and environmental exploitation.


* Exxon is expanding natural gas operations using Halliburton's "fracking" process, poisoning North American aquifers while selling jet fuel to US forces bombing Afghanistan until it's "stable" enough for pipelines moving Caspian natural gas.

* Shell simultaneously profits from Iraqi oilfields and from the fuel US tanks burn to protect them while clear-cutting for tar sands in Alberta and lobbying for "Clean Coal" technology in DC.

* Caterpillar sells the same monstrous gas-guzzling D-9 bulldozers to Massey Coal for mountaintop removal mining in West Virginia that US tax dollars buy for Israeli Military demolition of Palestinian homes.

Last month, Fossil Hawks celebrated two great victories: the US-led failure of the Copenhagen climate summit and Obama's escalation of the War on Terror in Afghanistan and Pakistan. Thanks to their aggressive lobbying, the world's worst CO2 emitters, companies like Shell and Exxon, are free from new international pollution regulations and stand ready to reap huge profits from Obama's expanding resource wars in the strategic oil and natural gas-rich warzones of the Middle East and Central Asia.

The importance of challenging the violence and treachery of corporate power is becoming increasingly clear to the Climate and Anti-War Movements. If we want to turn the tide of climate chaos and corporate resource imperialism, then 2010 must be a year of unprecedented cooperation between our movements in creative resistance against the Fossil Hawks.

>> What to do, what to do.

We're doing an action in DC later this month that we're calling "Funk the Warming" and we'd like to see other folks around the country taking on the Fossil Hawks by any funky means necessary.

We'd also like to hear your feedback on the idea. So, hit up the wall on our group or email us at funkthewar9@gmail.com

♥ + justice

the rebel funk armada

Monday, October 12, 2009

October 24th - 350 Day of Action

If you take part in only one climate protest in your life, it should be this one: October 24th - International Day of Climate Action

Tuesday, May 26, 2009

The Case for (and Against) Grass-fed Ruminants

Dearest Jeffie Poo II,

In response to your comment left many moons ago, I offer a link to this article on the environmental impacts of beef, both pastorally raised and otherwise. The article again sites Diet, Energy & Climate Change (PDF) as a primary source, and points out that grass-fed cows actually burp up more methane than corn-fed cows.

But global warming pollution isn't the only monster under the bed. As Eschel Gidons, co-author of Diet, Energy & Climate Change discusses with Grist: [Cow manure] could [...] reduce eutrophication of waterways caused by excess fertilizer runoff. "...Cows have this uncanny ability to recycle local nutrients. Pooping is one of their biggest talents. And that’s what we need of them, really.”

So cow pies, in small, well-distributed batches, have a role in sustainable food production. But if global green-house-gas emissions needed to peak by 2015 in order to not torch the Amazon or displace millions of people (which they must), in spite of an ever-growing, ever-richer, ever-more energy intensive world population, then we probably need to eat less cow.

Tuesday, February 03, 2009

Biggest Ever Protest on Global Warming at D.C. Coal Plant

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: February 3, 2009

Advisory: Biggest Ever Civil Disobedience on Global Warming at Congressional Power Plant
1000+ Already Signed Up to Participate; Dr. James Hansen, Others to Protest Use of Coal

WASHINGTON— A national coalition of more than 40 environmental, public health, labor, social justice, faith-based and other advocacy groups today announce plans to engage in civil disobedience at the Capitol Power Plant in Washington D.C. on the afternoon of March 2, 2009. The Capitol Climate Action (CCA), the largest mass mobilization on global warming in the country’s history, reflects the growing public demand for bold action to address the climate and energy crises.

“The Capitol Climate Action comes not a moment too soon. For more than thirty years, scientists, environmentalists and people from all walks of life have urged our leaders to take action to stop global warming; and that action has yet to come,” said Dr. James Hansen, one of the world’s leading climate scientists. Dr. Hansen will join the protest. “Coal is the biggest source of greenhouse gas emissions in the country and that must change. The world is waiting for the Obama administration and Congress to lead the way forward on this defining issue of our time. They need to start by getting coal out of Congress.”

The Capitol Power Plant, which is owned by Congress and sits just blocks from the American seat of power, burns coal to heat and cool numerous buildings on Capitol Hill. The facility no longer generates electricity but its reliance on coal – the country’s biggest source of global warming pollution and a documented health hazard – has made it the focus of political controversy and a powerful symbol of coal’s impact on the environment and public health.

“This demonstration marks the beginning of a sustained effort to draw a line in the sand against this dirty and dangerous fuel,” said Matt Leonard of Greenpeace, which is helping to organize the protest. “Our leaders cannot promise us a healthy and prosperous future as long as coal is polluting our soil, water and atmosphere.”

"We can no longer wait for the changes we know we can, and must, make today,” continued Rebecca Tarbotton of Rainforest Action Network (RAN), a lead sponsor of the action. “We’ve got to take the slogan ‘yes we can’ seriously. With a new administration and a new Congress, we have a window of opportunity to build a clean energy economy that will protect the health of our families, our climate and our future.”

The diversity of groups involved in the action reflects the number of people affected by global warming. Of all the fossil fuels, coal is the single biggest contributor to global warming. Burning coal cuts short at least 24,000 lives in the U.S. annually, inflicts catastrophic damage to the landscape and water supplies, and jeopardizes the lives of coal miners. Furthermore, the December coal ash spill in Tennessee makes it clear that there is no adequate means of safely storing coal combustion waste.

“As the impacts of global warming accelerate, thousands of people from all walks of life will join together in early March,” said Mike Tidwell of the Chesapeake Climate Action Network (CCAN). “We will be participating in the time-honored American tradition of peaceful resistance, this time in the name of stopping the great moral wrong of climate change.”

In response to public pressure, the House of Representatives converted half of the plant’s fuel to cleaner natural gas. But attempts to remove coal from the fuel mix entirely have been blocked by powerful coal-state Senators Robert C. Byrd (D-W.Va.) and Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.).

A recent University of Massachusetts study found investing in clean energy projects like wind power and mass transit creates three to four times more jobs than the same expenditure on the coal industry. The wind power sector has grown to employ more Americans than coal mining as demand for clean energy has jumped over the past decade.

For a list of sponsors and more information about the Capitol Climate Action, visit www.capitolclimateaction.org

###

CONTACTS: Mike Crocker, Greenpeace USA Media Officer, 202-319-2471; Nell Greenberg, Communications Manager, Rainforest Action Network, 510-847-9777; Anne Havemann, Communications Director, CCAN, 240-396-2022

References:

“Reliance on Coal Sullies ‘Green the Capitol’ Effort.” Washington Post. April 21, 2007
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/04/20/AR2007042002128.html

“Dirty Air Dirty: Mortality and Health Damage Due to Pollution from Power Plants.” A Clean Air Task Force Report
http://www.catf.us/publications/reports/Dirty_Air_Dirty_Power.pdf

“Wind Jobs Outstrip the Coal Industry.” CNNMoney.com.
http://greenwombat.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2009/01/28/wind-jobs-outstrip-the-coal-industry/

Tuesday, September 30, 2008

Vegetarian News Article & A Shout Out

Yet another news article discussing the negative environmental and health consequences of excessive meat consumption.

This article was posted by a friend of mine from college. The lovely Ms. M, mechanical engineer, aspiring architect and all around impressive person, keeps a blog detailing her quest towards making her life more sustainable by setting herself monthly goals. The title of the blog is Virescent - meaning "tending towards green."

I especially enjoy Ms. M's postings on thrifting, as I have long used thrift stores to pacify my consumerist tendencies. (Or maybe I'm just cheap.) It's amazing how often frugality and sustainability overlap. I would argue that in the rare cases where they do not overlap - like with factory farming - either a) there are excessive government subsidies distorting the true cost, and/or b) the costs of resource consumption/environmental damage are not being factored into the cost.

Wednesday, September 24, 2008

Why the left coast is better. Reason #1

New Belgium Brewery

Not only does this employee-owned company make incredibly delicious beer and power their brewery with wind turbines, they also are the creators of
TEAM WONDERBIKE **dramatic music***!!!!

Beautiful quotes shamelessly ripped from TEAMWONDERBIKE.com:


Why I ride...

to be reminded of all the wonderful things about where i live
to help keep Earth cool (in terms of temperature and style)
'cause ExxonMobil already has enough money
to justify shaving my legs
-Jay Richardson

I love high velocity and moments of absolute zen. Floating over rock fields and sticking tight corners. Becoming one with my bike, when the ride is all there is.
-Adrian Matthew


I ride because my troubles can't catch me when I'm on two wheels.
-Jeremy Walker

i ride so i don't forget what it feels like to be young and inspired
-Tanya Victor

One time a mother goose flew after me while I rode bike down by the river in the springtime. Now that's fun! I've never been chased by a mother goose while driving a car.
-Garth Bontrager

To fight war, bad government, global warming, corporate greed and monster trucks.
-Bryan Simpson

When civilization falls, global warming peaks, fossil fuels are gone, and you say "why didn't I just ride my bike?", you will be too out of shape and get eaten by wolves. Ride now to avoid the wolves later.
-Phil Mackey

i ride because... bikes are the answer
-Brian Callahan

Sunday, August 24, 2008

The Great Thing About Global Warming

What’s the difference between a drowned American, a drowned Chinese person and a drowned Indian? Absolutely nothing.

This is how I feel about America’s refusal to engage on binding carbon-emission-reduction treaties like Kyoto. As America frets about losing her place as the economic prom queen, she’s ignoring the fact that the vast majority of her citizens, if held under water for an extended period of time, will die. New York is just waiting to fall off its rock. Los Angeles has been itching to go aquatic since God invented earthquakes. (Not that anybody will miss it much. Plus, everyone will have already left for want of drinking water). But this is why global warming is so brilliant. It doesn’t matter where the pollution is coming from. We’re all screwed. Everybody loses.


Always before pollution has been a localized problem. Indeed, the technical definition of pollution is an excessive concentration of any substance within a given volume. Normally, that “volume” is something fairly specific like the water downstream from a paper mill or the air under an overpass. People with choice move upstream or into the suburbs, and since it is the people with choice that make money from the pollution generators and write the laws that govern them, change happens slowly. Only when the people with choice can not reasonably escape is serious action taken.


The EPA’s immensely successful Acid Rain Program is an excellent example of this. East coast cities in the US were suffering because of NOx and S
Ox that were blowing their way from Midwestern and Appalachian cars and coal fired power plants. A regulatory scheme was concocted that sets a cap for acid-rain-causing emissions and requires industry to acquire pollution credits, which they can then trade. SO2 levels will have dropped almost by half since 1980 and the program was significantly less expensive to operate than originally projected. Excellent indeed, but I doubt the EPA would jump so fast if the Midwest started catching the pollution of wealthy East Coasters.

What I glean from all this is that cap-and-trade trade treaties (like Kyoto) can be used to great effect if the rich parties involved think they have something to gain from signing on.
Apparently, America still thinks that she will fare fine in the face of climate change, or at least fare better than other countries with fewer resources. But keeping up with the Joneses becomes a morbid game when the contest is over who will have fewer hundreds-of-thousands of deaths and climate refugees.

With the biggest historical carbon footprint by far, the most luxury emissions and the richest population in the world, America has the most room for improvement and the most power to change. In order to avoid the worst disasters associated with a rapidly warming planet, we need to make big changes and big sacrifices immediately. So I implore you America: keep stalling if you want. Keep bemoaning the inaction of India and China, whose per capita emissions are small fractions of ours. Carry on as you were; you will only be hurting everybody.

Thursday, July 31, 2008

Note to Los Angeles

You are big. There is so much of you. I guess you knew that already. I want to hate you. I want you to embody everything I think is wrong with America. The cars. The eternal sprawl. The fuck you I've got mines. Is it the earthquakes that keep you from building up at all? London isn't that tall. The apartment building I'm looking at is as tall as London; it seems to be in one piece.

A beautifully Hollywood couple just walked by me. Maybe I just want a fancy car. Maybe I wouldn't complain at all if I had a Hummer and could afford the gas to power it from my house on the hill to my job that I hate. Maybe it would be worth it if I got to bang the beautiful faux hippie who's underwear I can sort of see.

What is the greatest good? Is human society the apex? Is it worth fighting for? Is it worth destroying our forests so that we can make science and movies? If god never really existed anyway... fuck that. Who really went about their business because of god? A few people, schon. Aber die meisten?

If I really just want to pass on my genetic material... If I can create an entire institution, my children and my brainchild will live on after me, and because my son is a Guggenheim, because my son's father spent four years throwing his mind at the walls and leaders of an institution that is somebody's brainchild, because I have a building, my great grandson is totally going to get laid. A lot.

And if we are social beings, if we gain status by aligning ourselves with a group of people and proving that we are the best at being that group, suddenly it doesn't matter what we believe - only that we believe. Thank goodness there are so many pursuits. Thank goodness I don't have to be nice to everyone.

(written during visit to L.A. - January, 2008)

Monday, July 21, 2008

To All the Coffee Drinkers

Eighty percent of the original forests on this planet have either been destroyed or degraded due to human activity. Twenty percent of the world’s ancient forests have been cleared in the last 50 years (Greenpeace, 2008). That is terrifying. How do we stop it?

In Guatemala, 56% of the population is below the poverty line. Roughly half of all Guatemalans work in the agriculture industry (CIA World Factbook). The minimum wage for agricultural workers in Guatemala is 30 Quetzales per day (As Green As It Gets, 2005). To buy two avocados, a can of black beans, a can of corn and a bottle of water today, I spent 30 Quetzales (My Receipt, 2008).

…Guatemala has one of the most extensive and diverse forest systems in Central America… Most rural Guatemalans have few employment options; they must live off the land that surrounds them making use of whatever resources they can find. Their poverty and relative lack of opportunity mean the country's forests are falling at one of the highest rates in Latin America… Between 1990 and 2005, Guatemala lost 17 percent of its total forest cover and deforestation rates have increased by nearly 13 percent since the close of the 1990s. (Mongabay, 2008)

So what does one do? People have to eat. This is a question that has lingered in the back of my mind throughout a lot of Greenpeace forest campaigns. Yes, it is excellent that McDonalds has stopped buying soybeans from recently deforested land in the Amazon, but what are those farmers doing now? My guess is they are still cutting down trees to plant soybeans.

This conundrum has million of permutations and will clearly require just as many solutions; here is one in the form of a non-profit called As Green As It Gets run by an expatriate, Franklin Vorhees. I listened to Franklin speak at the Rainbow Reading Room, a gringo hang out in Antigua that hosts leftward leaning speakers every Tuesday in order to attract the Chaco-wearing crowd. The following Sunday, I took the bus to nearby San Juan del Obispo to join Franklin, his two NYU grad student volunteers, and a handful of local farmers to plant trees. Fortunately for them, about 30 more farmers showed up than they had been expecting, and they showed up at the crack of dawn. So, when I rolled up at 9 o’clock, there were no more trees to be planted. Instead, I followed Franklin and his posse around to the abodes and workshops of a couple local artisans: a jade cutter (pictured), an iron worker and a furniture maker. I returned to the jade cutters house twice the following week to make a birthday present for Jen.

During his talk at the Reading Rainbow, Franklin explained his philosophy of development: teach a man to feed a man a fish. Basically, he helps sustenance farmers enter the cash economy by planting fewer food crops and more cash crops, like coffee. The more food you grow the more people you can grow. And while it’s relatively easy to plant enough food for people to eat, or at least reproduce, it’s very expensive and time consuming to increase infrastructure to deal with exponentially increasing human population. The idea is to increase the quality of life without increasing the quantity of life.

Through community cooperatives, micro-loans, volunteer work and direct trade networks in the U.S. As Green As It Gets provides the initial capital, knowledge and material resources needed to “encourage environmentally responsible agriculture in Guatemala.” Furthermore, they have helped a number of small businesses grow out of agricultural waste products. For example, there is a woman who makes beauty products out of cocoa butter, beeswax and macadamia oil and a team of women that make purses out of burlap sacks used for coffee beans. Additionally, farmers are encouraged, and provided with seeds, to replant deforested area with trees that can help them provide shade for under story crops, food, and firewood, as well as make a profit and fix nitrogen in the soil.

What about the coffee? By roasting some of it themselves and selling the coffee directly to consumers in the US, As Green As It Gets farmers get more money per pound than big coffee would have paid and more even than Fair Trade requires. ( Read why they opted not to pursue the Fair Trade certificate.) The following season, the farmers are able to pass the wealth on to their neighbors by buying some of their beans from them at higher prices and employing them during the harvesting and sorting process. How much does the coffee cost? $8/lb. plus shipping ($9.80/lb. for 5 lbs shipped to D.C.) which cleanly beats Starbucks' Guatemala Antigua blend at $10.65/lb.

Also check out Franklin's opinion articles: Where's your spare planet? On CAFTA (Central American Free Trade Agreement) and Glorifying the Poor.

Wednesday, July 16, 2008

Spanish homework turns philosophical

...I would like to beg you dear Sir, as well as I can, to have patience with everything unresolved in your heart and to try to love the questions themselves as if they were locked rooms or books written in a very foreign language. Don't search for the answers, which could not be given to you now, because you would not be able to live them. And the point is to live everything. Live the questions now. Perhaps then, someday far in the future, you will gradually, without even noticing it, live your way into the answer.

Rainer Maria Rilke, 1903
in Letters to a Young Poet

Las Palabras Interrogativas

¿Por qué no es posible cerrar mi cerebro?
Why is it not possible to turn off my brain?

¿Cómo podemos cambiar la infraestructura de la energía?
How can we change the energy infrastructure?

¿A quién necesitamos matar?
Who do we need to kill?

¿Quién es responsable?
Who is responsible?

¿De quien es el mundo? ¿De quien es el agua?
Who's earth is it? Who's water is it?

¿Cuánto cuesta nuestra inacción?
How much does our inaction cost?

¿Cual es el problema de los Estados Unidos?
What is the problem with the United States?

¿Qué hace que nosotros pensamos que vamos a poder vivir así por siempre?
What makes us think that we are going to be able to live like this forever?

¿Dónde esta mi juicio?
Where is my mind/sanity?

Todo depende de a dónde vamos en los próximos diez años.
Everything depends on where we go in the next ten years. (NASA's lead climatologist gives us 10 years to curb emissions at their current level before we reach a tipping point.)

¿Cómo no soy yo mismo?
How am I not myself?

¿De dónde vino la idea que podemos crecer sin fin?
From whence came the idea that we can grow without end?

¿Cuál es la diferencia entre uno Americano, que se ahogó, y uno Chino, que se ahogó? Nada.
What is the difference between a drowned American and a drowned Chinese person? Nothing.

¿Cuándo es aceptable castrar a los hombres?
When is it acceptable to castrate men? (My Spanish teacher, Carolina, came up with two situations 1) too many people 2) violence towards women.)

¿Qué es necesario para una vida buena?
What is necessary for a good life?

¿Para que tenemos los niños?
For what do have children?

¿Cuántas personas son demasiadas personas?
How many people are too many people?

Carolina thinks that the last three questions are inherently related: What is necessary for a good life is to propagate the species and pass on our knowledge to the next generation, but people should stop after 2 or 3 babies. We agreed that all men should have mandatory vasectomies after the second or third child. Or alternatively, since vasectomies are minimally invasive and reversible, all boys should be given vasectomies as soon as they hit puberty and should continue shooting blanks until they turn 26. This would eliminate teenage pregnancy, reduce the number of children by shrinking the window of fertility, and insure that people having babies were older and better educated. And there is a strong correlation between education and lower birth rates. Everybody wins! (My Spanish teacher clearly rocks.)

Monday, July 14, 2008

Basic Update

As of the beginning of June, I am no longer working at Greenpeace. I very much love what Greenpeace is all about, but my grassroots burn-out job had left me feeling a bit... burnt out.

So now I'm busy being a vagabond student of sorts in Guatemala. My sister is living in Guatemala City on a Fullbright scholarship doing forensic anthropology at the FAFG. In 1954 the CIA staged a coup, ousting the communist-leaning, popular and democratically elected president of Guatemala Jacobo Arbenz Guzmán. This ended a period of relative stability and plunged the country into 30 years of internal conflict and genocide against the majority, indigenous Mayan population. Jen is helping to excavate mass graves, identify the bodies and return the remains to surviving family members for reburial. Check out her blog: Digging for Truth.

I've been taking one-on-one Spanish classes for four hours a day and living with a host family in Antigua for the past couple weeks. Antigua is considerably safer and considerably more gringoey than Guatemala City, but a close chicken-bus ride away. Antigua was once the capital of Latin America, known for its Spanish colonial architecture. After this I'll hopefully be moving on to Quetzaltenango (The Place of the Quetzal Bird) also known as Xelajú (Under Ten Mountains) or just Xela (pronounced "Shay-la"). Xela is the second biggest city in Guatemala and has a 50% indigenous population. There I will be doing an internship with a non-profit travel agency. Basically, I recruit gringos to go hike volcanoes, and the money is used to build libraries in rural communities.

The goal is to stay here as long as possible (money being the limiting reagent) in order to 1) learn Spanish 2) get a taste for a developing country 3) contemplate things big and small as I figure out the next step in life.

(Fun fact: The long, green tail feathers of the quetzal were once used by Mayan rulers in their head dresses. The feathers were traded almost like currency, and this is where the Guatemalan Quetzal gets its name.)

Thursday, July 10, 2008

veganism and environmental justice

Lets all think back to Mr. Keener's AP biology class. Any given ecosystem can support significantly more herbavores than carnivores. That's because 90% of the energy is lost at each tropic level. The majority of the food that an animal eats is used to keep it warm and kicking. Only 10% goes to making flesh. Meaning if you were to eat the grain, rather than eating the cow fed by the grain, you would only need to grow 1/10th of the grain, which would require 1/10th the amount of land. Furthermore, the processing of animal products is extremely energy intensive, requiring refrigeration, rapid transportation, and a shit ton of water to clean slaughter houses.

Livestock are responsible for 18 percent of greenhouse-gas emissions as measured in carbon dioxide equivalent, reports the FAO. This includes 9 percent of all CO2 emissions, 37 percent of methane, and 65 percent of nitrous oxide. Altogether, that's more than the emissions caused by transportation.
csmonitor

That statistic is a little misleading, because many more people eat meat in the world than drive cars (so you're not off the hook for driving everywhere). In terms of cutting down on your GHGs researches concluded that
dietary changes could make more difference than trading in a standard sedan for a more efficient hybrid car, which reduces annual CO2 emissions by roughly one ton a year.

(from Diet, Energy & Climate Change by Gidon Eshel and Pamela Martin)

So when the U.N. added it all up, what they found is that eating chickens, pigs, and other animals contributes to "problems of land degradation, climate change and air pollution, water shortage and water pollution, and loss of biodiversity," and that meat-eating is "one of the ... most significant contributors to the most serious environmental problems, at every scale from local to global.

And on the issue of global warming, the issue the New York Times deems critical enough to demand that we "change [our] lifestyles" and for which Al Gore and the IPCC received the Nobel peace prize, the United Nations' scientists conclude that eating animals causes 40 percent more global warming than all planes, cars, trucks, and other forms of transport combined, which is why the Live Earth Global Warming Survival Handbook says that "refusing meat" is "the single most effective thing you can do to reduce your carbon footprint" [emphasis in original].

There is a lot of important attention paid to population, and that's a critical issue too, but if we're consuming 11 times as much as people in China and 32 times as much as people in the third world, then it's not just about population; it's also about consumption.
www.alternet.org

From a human rights perspective, it is important to keep in mind that forest loss and land reposition contribute to sometimes violent removal of indigenous populations from their land. Cattle grazing and soy production (something like 80% of which is used to feed livestock) are two of the biggest factors contributing to deforestation in the Amazon. It is also worth pointing out that something like 60% of soy production in the Amazon is funded by three American agrigiants (Cargill, ADM, and I forget the third).

Here's an article about indigenous murders & suicides linked to land shortage and agriculture in Brazil. The main crop they're planting is sugarcane to make Ethanol (Brazil gets most of their fuel from ethanol) but the secondary crop is soy.
ipsnews.net

Livestock now use 30 per cent of the earth's entire land surface, mostly permanent pasture but also including 33 per cent of the global arable land used to producing feed for livestock, the report notes. As forests are cleared to create new pastures, it is a major driver of deforestation, especially in Latin America where, for example, some 70 per cent of former forests in the Amazon have been turned over to grazing.

At the same time herds cause wide-scale land degradation, with about 20 per cent of pastures considered degraded through overgrazing, compaction and erosion. This figure is even higher in the drylands where inappropriate policies and inadequate livestock management contribute to advancing desertification.

The livestock business is among the most damaging sectors to the earth's increasingly scarce water resources, contributing among other things to water pollution from animal wastes, antibiotics and hormones, chemicals from tanneries, fertilizers and the pesticides used to spray feed crops.
www.un.org



Tuesday, June 27, 2006

Monday, June 26, 2006

Illinois Farmer

Bury this old Illinois farmer with respect.
He slept the Illinois nights of his life after days of work in Illinois
cornfields.
Now he goes on a long sleep.
The wind he listened to in the cornsilk and the tassels, the wind
that combed his red beard zero mornings when the snow lay
white on the yellow ears in the bushel basket at the corncrib,
The same wind will now blow over the place here where his hands must dream of Illinois corn.
- Carl Sandburg

The day before yesterday I sat down at the dinner table after an awesome 80 mile ride into Gilman, IL (pop. 1100) with a man who lives 300 yard from where he was born. He must be in his seventies and has worked as a farmer of corn, wheat and soy all his life. He ran the youth program at his church until he couldn’t keep up with them and says “ruf” rather than “roof” and maintains distinction between “setting oneself down” and “sitting”. Yesterday, I ate dinner with a 78 year old man who still works his 2500 acres of corn, wheat and soy with his son outside of Pontiac, IL. He fought in Korea, is missing half a finger, has beautiful, old leathery hands, and has been to Haiti six times with his church on service projects. Today, 32 of us stopped by his farm on the way out of town, where he showed us his tractors, had us nibble on fresh grains of wheat, and introduced us to his son, who has the most beautiful self-remodeled house of barn wood and polished copper. His son works 12-14 hour days for 5 months of the year, and rents the 2 bedroom, single-story house with yard and garage, which is adjacent across the street from his house and 70 miles south of Chicago for $300 dollars a month. Jose described Jean Lyons, the father, as the best man he’s ever met.

Yesterday, Robin’s Dad and Uncle accompanied us for the 42 mile jaunt from Gilman to Pontiac (we didn’t even stop for lunch). It’s funny how relative distances have become. The very first day we did 30 or so miles, which took us all day, and we all cringed at the 60 mile day which followed. Today was almost considered a day off. We found ourselves on a series of small roads laid down in a perfect grid, which divided endless fields of corn, wheat and soy into square miles. Endless fields + all the time in the world = The only possible solution to this equation… The Naked Mile. Robin opted out on account of her dad and uncle. This upset Robin greatly, as she frequently talks about how more frequent occurrences of complete nudity would benefit society (this is perhaps a more reasonable theory than my claim that co-ed bathrooms would reduce violence against women). All told there were about 20 of us who stripped naked and proceeded to bike two miles wearing nothing but our shoes, our camelbacks and our helmets. I was definitely the first person naked.

awandering out on the hills of iowa

So, new plan…
Seeing that is June 27th, a mere 24 days since my last entry, I have decided to record some of the more recent happenings of Bike & Build, as they are fresh in my mind, and fill in the gaps eventually.

Tuesday, June 27, 2006
Peru, IL to Clinton, IA 90miles

We woke up at 5:30 this morning in preparation for a long day.

I had a bike date with Christine “Coach” Culver today – part of the Kent crew (Christine, Sam and I rode together on an awesome ride into Kent, Connecticut what seems like eons ago). I was feeling pretty awesome for the first 50 miles before lunch – the sky was big and blue and dotted with puffy clouds; there were these hills that appeared out of nowhere taking us all by surprise, but they were nice rolling hills that added some spice to the Illinois flatness.

After lunch the wind picked up… oh man the wind. Wind is a very demoralizing thing on a bike. Its worse even then huge hills I would say. When climbing hills you can see the hill. You realize its huge and that it’s going to kick your butt, and you’re ready for it. You crank it into granny gear, put your head down and go. And once you’re at the top you can inform the hill that it has been owned, and then cruise down the other side at 40 miles per hour.

Wind on the other hand… You can’t see it. Sometimes I don’t even notice it. I look down at my speedometer and realize that I’m killing myself just to go 13 mph on a slight downgrade. You can’t conquer the wind. You can’t inform the wind loudly and profanely that it has been conquered. And fighting the wind for 30 minutes does not necessarily mean that you have increased your potential energy. Wind is rough. The wind today was not as bad as it was before the storm a couple days ago, but it did suffice to put me in a bad mood until we reached the mighty Missippi. There we paused to admire the view and our progress, before we caulked our bikes and attempted to ford the river. It’s amazing how much of the sky you can see when the landscape is generally flat. Looking out from the bridge half the sky was covered in friendly blue with happy white clouds and half by the angry looking storm that more or less left us alone (except for the wind).

I rode into Clinton, Iowa belting Dar Williams’ “Iowa”.

Thursday, June 15, 2006

Starting with a Storm

June 3rd
Providence, RI to Pomfret, CT 40 miles (when all was said and done)

At 6 o’clock this morning Jose “You can’t stop the Soultrain” Soltren woke us up with his already too familiar, “Good morning Bike & Build. It’s 6 am. Today, we will be riding…” There was rain falling hard and resonating throughout the beautiful church, which housed us for our two nights in Providence.

Around 10 o’clock we mounted our iron steeds (actually our aluminum and carbon fiber steeds) and set off into the pouring rain heading towards the Main Green of Brown University for our send-off. In a moment of uncharacteristic absentmindedness, I left my brand-new fancy-pants neon-green raincoat at the showering facility, which didn’t reopen until noon. Biking does not mix well with wet and cold; I was shivering fiercely in a matter of minutes.

Luckily, the rain let up when we arrived at the Main Green, and the send-off was absolutely fantastic. There were a lot of people there: family, friends, significant others, the awesome French-guy who is the assistant director of Habitat for Humanity in Providence and even a news camera. People were really excited about what we are undertaking, and this helped to lift general morale in spite of the lousy weather.

After dipping our back wheels in the Narragansett Bay (you know, that whole ocean to ocean thing) we were off. Just outside of Providence a very small but tenacious shard of glass attacked my innertube. Apparently, road debris tends to be more ferocious when it’s wet outside (I’m assuming because things are more likely to stick to your tires).

After fixing my flat I found myself at the back of the pack. A number less experienced riders were having difficulty on the hills, and were insisting on walking up them. One of the girls, Miho, needed only a little encouragement, some minor gear-shifting instruction and the tiniest bit of goading on my part before she was conquering hills like a champion.

Lunch consisted of leftist peanut butter out of 35 lb. bucket, which was made and donated by a natural foods co-op at Brown, and jelly. This is a staple of Bike & Build. That and massages / back cracking.

New England is beautiful. The misty overcast weather was very fitting to the old farm houses and oak-studded forests. I loved the lush green moss-and-fern-covered landscape of Connecticut, with its endless stonewalls and speckling of ponds and lakes.

New England is, however, also cold. And rainy. After a day of riding in wet, cold conditions (it started raining again in the afternoon) and then not being able to find the church where were to stay for the night, two riders started suffering from hypothermia. I had noticed a couple minutes previously that Sam obviously wasn’t doing well, but he insisted that he just needed to keep biking. I should have taken more definitive action. Finn, who is making a documentary of our trip, realizing that Jay was in bad shape, stripped him of his wet clothes and gave him dry ones. I then informed Finn that we needed to help Sam as well. Sam got picked up by the van and was taken to the hospital later. It turned it out that he was minorly hypothermic and majorly hypoglycemic (and according to the doctor taking opiates… the old poppy seed bagel trick).

Oh yeah, and my friend Chip/Jeff got hit by a car. The driver of the car did not yield to oncoming Chips while turning right on red. Chip was fine, though shaken.

Later at the Church, the mother of a P2S alum came up to me and asked me if I needed a hug. I did, and she completely made my day.

Thursday, June 01, 2006

Warming Up

After packing all night Wednesday (I only had one 4500 cubic inch bag that I could bring and yet I was still up all night doing it), with a brief layover in Cambridge, I arrived in Providence, RI today with a bag full of still-damp clothes. Tomorrow we continue with our orientation, testing our bicycles on a short ride and learning more about affordable housing. On Saturday, June 3, we will dip our wheels into the Narragansett Bay and start on the 35 mile first leg of our journey to Pomfret, CT (apparently Rhode Island is a small state).

I have already met a number of cool people, which is not terribly surprising – a group of young adults who want to bike across the country for a good cause is bound to contain some like minded people. This guy Sam, for example, is doing a Spanish major and a physics minor, and is contemplating joining the Peace Corps. His sister decided against the Peace Corps because she felt there existed an attitude of “hey, you third world non-westerners, we’ve pretty much got it all figured out already so uh… do it our way,” which is the source of my hesitation as well.
Another guy is currently doing a Masters in linguistics. He’s studying intonation patters in bilingual speakers of English and Spanish (Chicano?). He’s finding that rather than switching intonation when switching from one language to the other, the speaker maintains the intonation of the language which he started in. So if the speaker started a sentence in English and substituted a Spanish noun s/he would still use the English intonation.

Today I heard the following sentence from a Boston bike cop, “So, where youse going?”

Providence is a lovely town to which I’d like to return. The houses in the area where I am are particularly attractive, which I attribute largely to the texture and quality of the building materials (which is probably also a sign of wealthy owners and old houses).

I am incredibly stoked. Thank you so much to everybody who helped to get me here. Bring on saddle sores, bring on the (sun)burn!

Tuesday, May 30, 2006

talk to me

In addition to this personal online journal, Bike & Build will be maintaining a group photo album and journal for each trip.

Online journal:
http://www.bikeandbuild.org/follow/journals/P2S06.php

Photo Gallery:
http://www.bikeandbuild.org/follow/gallery/index.php?gallery=./2006/P2S

Also, there are a number of mail drops scheduled for those of you who would like to send me mail/ boxes of delectables. Thanks:

http://www.bikeandbuild.org/maildrops.html

Sunday, May 28, 2006

T minus 5 days, and counting...

In five days I will begin biking across the country to raise funds and awareness for the affordable housing cause. Obviously this necessitated the creation of a blog, and I therefore do not feel compelled to engage in an oh-so-very-meta discussion of the merits of blogs on a blog.